On 08/07/2018 11:17 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 07/08/18 16:02, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 08/07/2018 09:11 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 13/06/18 11:58, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> Using privcmd_call() for a singleton multicall seems to be wrong, as >>>> privcmd_call() is using stac()/clac() to enable hypervisor access to >>>> Linux user space. >>>> >>>> Add a new xen_single_call() function to be use for that purpose. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> >>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]> >>> Boris, any objections? >> >> I think Jan wanted a change in commit message. I can commit with this: >> >> "Using privcmd_call() for a singleton multicall seems to be wrong, as >> privcmd_call() is using stac()/clac() to enable hypervisor access to >> Linux user space. >> >> Even if currently not a problem (pv domains can't use SMAP while HVM >> and PVH domains can't use multicalls) things might change when >> PVH dom0 support is added to the kernel." > This would be fine, thanks.
Applied to for-linus-4.19 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
