On 7/28/26 9:26 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Like other resource management hooks they are mainly different in "add
resource" vs "remove resource". Hence like in other cases a single hook
can easily serve both purposes, with minor tweaking of
flask_bind_pt_irq(). While adjusting that function, also defer the setting
of "dperm", which is only needed in the "map" case.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>

--- a/xen/arch/arm/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domctl.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ long arch_do_domctl(struct xen_domctl *d
          if ( rc )
              return rc;
- rc = xsm_bind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind);
+        rc = xsm_bind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind, true);
          if ( rc )
              return rc;
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ long arch_do_domctl(struct xen_domctl *d
          if ( irq != virq )
              return -EINVAL;
- rc = xsm_unbind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind);
+        rc = xsm_bind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind, false);
          if ( rc )
              return rc;
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
          if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
              break;
- ret = xsm_bind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind);
+        ret = xsm_bind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind, true);
          if ( ret )
              break;
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
          if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) )
              break;
- ret = xsm_unbind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind);
+        ret = xsm_bind_pt_irq(XSM_DM_PRIV, d, bind, false);
          if ( ret )
              break;
--- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
@@ -478,14 +478,8 @@ static XSM_INLINE int xsm_map_domain_irq
  }
static XSM_INLINE int xsm_bind_pt_irq(
-    XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *bind)
-{
-    XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_DM_PRIV);
-    return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
-}
-
-static XSM_INLINE int xsm_unbind_pt_irq(
-    XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *bind)
+    XSM_DEFAULT_ARG struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *bind,
+    bool allow)
  {
      XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_DM_PRIV);
      return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d);
--- a/xen/include/xsm/hooks.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/hooks.h
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ XSM_HOOK(int, map_domain_pirq, struct do
  #endif
XSM_HOOK(int, map_domain_irq, struct domain *, int, const pci_sbdf_t *, bool)
-XSM_HOOK(int, bind_pt_irq, struct domain *, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *)
-XSM_HOOK(int, unbind_pt_irq, struct domain *, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *)
+XSM_HOOK(int, bind_pt_irq, struct domain *, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *,
+                           bool)
XSM_HOOK(int, irq_permission, struct domain *, int, bool)
  XSM_HOOK(int, iomem_permission, struct domain *, uint64_t, uint64_t, bool)
--- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
+++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
@@ -1090,16 +1090,15 @@ static int cf_check flask_map_domain_irq
  }
static int cf_check flask_bind_pt_irq(
-    struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *bind)
+    struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_bind_pt_irq *bind, bool access)
  {
-    uint32_t dsid, rsid;
+    uint32_t dsid, rsid, dperm;
      int rc = -EPERM;
      int irq;
      struct avc_audit_data ad;
-    uint32_t dperm = flask_iommu_resource_use_perm(d);
- rc = current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__ADD);
-    if ( rc )
+    rc = current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, resource_to_perm(access));
+    if ( rc || access )

Same as on patch 23, check is inverted.

v/r,
dps

Reply via email to