Hi Andrew, While reviewing those patches i found out that cover letter is saying that the serie has 5 patches but then the patches are number out of 6. Is there a patch missing or something went wrong in the numbering and there is actually on 5 patches ?
Regards Bertrand > On 31 Aug 2026, at 14:19, Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > > Patch 1 is a bugfix for the issue reported by Jan Setje-Eilers. It needs > backporting to Xen 4.22. > > Everything else is because I couldn't bear to leave the code generation in > such a bad state. > > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/hardware/xen-staging/-/pipelines/2805409790 > > Andrew Cooper (5): > xen/arm: Fix evaluation of parameters for SMCCC calls > xen/arm: Introduce arm_smccc_guest_smc() > xen/arm: Clean up 32bit arm_smccc_1_1_smc() > xen/arm: Rewrite arm_smccc_smc() for arm64 > xen/arm: Rewrite arm_smccc_*() to return by value > > xen/arch/arm/arm64/smc.S | 16 -- > xen/arch/arm/cpuerrata.c | 18 +- > xen/arch/arm/firmware/scmi-smc.c | 16 +- > xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h | 241 +++++++++++--------- > xen/arch/arm/platforms/exynos5.c | 2 +- > xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8m.c | 16 +- > xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c | 16 +- > xen/arch/arm/platforms/seattle.c | 4 +- > xen/arch/arm/platforms/xilinx-zynqmp-eemi.c | 17 +- > xen/arch/arm/psci.c | 17 +- > xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 4 +- > 11 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.39.5 >
