On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 03:32:58PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:43:29AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > > How does libvirt handle QEMU option deprecation? > > > > I don't think they handle it very well. I think it's basicaly when the > > deprecated option is removed from QEMU that they notice libvirt need to > > be fixed (That's what I got from reading a thread on qemu-devel). > > How do they fix this sort of things? Do they reject removed options or > try (as best effort) to translate?
I don't think those questions make senses. What "sort of things" ? Which "options", qemu command line/qmp options or user facing options? In anycase, I don't think I know enough about libvirt (even as a user) to be able to respond to those questions, but they would probably not have exposed -usbdevice to users, like we do. -- Anthony PERARD _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
