On 31/08/18 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 30.08.18 at 19:08, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 30/08/18 15:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 30.08.18 at 14:31, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> The observant amongst you might realise that this reverts parts of c/s
>>>> 51ad90aea21c - What can I say? Several years of hindsight is very useful,
>>>> and
>>>> at the time I did ask the maintainers which option they thought would be
>>>> better...
>>> ... I think both the earlier and this change are heading in the
>>> wrong direction: I would much rather see the newline omitted
>>> everywhere, _including_ in panic() itself: This causes one line
>>> less to scroll off the screen in case you don't have a serial
>>> console.
Can't we just drop printing the extra \n in panic()?
- printk("%s\n", buf);
+ printk("%s", buf);
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
