On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 03:48 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 03.09.18 at 15:14, <aisa...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> > 
> > This patch series addresses the ideea of saving data from a single
> > vcpu instance.
> > First it starts by adding *save_one functions, then it introduces a
> > handler for the
> > new save_one* funcs and makes use of it in the hvm_save and
> > hvm_save_one funcs.
> > The final patches are used for clean up and change the
> > hvm_save_one() func while 
> > changing domain_pause to vcpu_pause.
> 
> Considering the ongoing problems with the series, please going
> forward indicate here what exact testing you've done to make
> sure you introduce no regressions.
> 

I've tested with tools/misc/xen-hvmctx for xc_domain_hvm_getcontext 
and with tools/xentrace/xenctx for xc_domain_hvm_getcontext_partial.

Before this I first looked at the part of the guest startup when it
calls xc_domain_hvm_getcontext to save all the info.

If there are more tests that I could run please provide.

Thanks, 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to