On 10/10/2018 09:19, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: > >> You can just dive into the discussion we had back in February: > > That was half a year and a thousand commits ago! ;-)
Yes. :-) > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180213163244.j2zuxyhs4kbfh...@gmail.com/ >> >> The scheme I have used in V5 of the series is the one you agreed to use >> back then. >> >> A quick summary of the problem you mentioned: >> >> There are some downstream variants of grub2 with a patch breaking the >> boot protocol by writing garbage past the end of setup_header. Adding >> a new field at the end of setup_header (here: rsdp_address) resulted in >> those grub2 variants clobbering the preset value of 0. >> >> The solution is to let grub2 report back the used boot protocol version >> with setting a flag "I am reporting back my version". The kernel now is >> capable to know which fields of setup_header are known to grub2 and can >> act accordingly. >> >> The related grub2 patch series is under review right now. > > Ok, that's reassuring - that's all the context I needed. > > Would it help grub2 review+integration if we applied this to -tip and staged > it there until the Grub patches are accepted, or can I consider those changes > as grub2 upstream accepted? Applying to -tip would really be great! I can send you a note when the grub series has been accepted. The grub maintainer has already sent me a note he will be looking at the patches soon. > I'd like to help make it happen, let me know what the best route is. I appreciate that a lot! Thanks, Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
