On 10/5/18 2:00 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 9/27/18 2:25 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >> The name of the "with_gla" flag is confusing; it has nothing to do >> with the existence or lack thereof of a faulting GLA, but rather where >> the fault originated. The npfec.kind value is always valid, and >> should thus be propagated, regardless of whether gla_valid is set or >> not. >> >> In particular, gla_valid will never be set on AMD systems; but >> npfec.kind will still be valid and should still be propagated. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisa...@bitdefender.com> >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com> > > Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>
Does this also need Tamas' ack to go in? Thanks, Razvan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel