>>> On 19.10.18 at 16:30, <chao....@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:32:59AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>In commit 303066fdb1e ("VMX: fix interaction of APIC-V and Viridian
>>emulation") I screwed up quite heavily: Instead of clearing SVI, RVI was
>>cleared. Furthermore, unconditional clearing of SVI is wrong too - other
>>ISR bits should be taken into account.
>>
>>Introduce a new helper set_svi(), split out of vmx_process_isr(), and
>>use it also from vmx_handle_eoi().
>>
>>Following the problems in vmx_intr_assist() (see the still present big
>>block of debugging code there) also warn (once) if EOI'd vector and
>>original SVI don't match.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>
> After correcting the description in the first paragraph
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao....@intel.com>
With this - any chance of getting the necessary acks? Or
am I expected to re-submit with the (already) adjusted
description?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
