On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:28:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.10.18 at 17:23, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:44:20AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> There's no guarantee that e.g. a switch() control expression's memory > >> operand(s) get(s) read just once. Guard against the compiler producing > >> "unexpected" code by sprinkling around some ACCESS_ONCE(). > >> > >> I'm leaving alone opt_conswitch[]: It gets accessed in quite a few > >> places anyway, and an intermediate change won't have any severe effect > >> afaict. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > > > I'm curious how you came up with the list of parameters that need > > fixing. > > I've just gone through all that are currently run-time changable.
Fair enough. Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
