George Dunlap writes ("[PATCH 4/9] dm_depriv: Describe expected usage of
device_model_user parameter"):
> A number of subsequent patches rely on as-yet undefined behavior for
> what the `device_model_user` parameter does. Rather than implement it
> incorrectly (or randomly), or remove the feature, describe an expected
> usage for the feature. Further patches will make decisions based on
> this expected usage.
This document seems to document a fine feature. I don't mind the docs
patch being separate but I don't know why you wouldn't add it in the
same patch as you implement it.
So, I guess,
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
