On 12/2/18 3:31 PM, Manjunath Patil wrote:
> On 11/30/2018 2:33 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> On 11/30/18 4:49 PM, Manjunath Patil wrote:
>>> Thank you Boris for your comments. I removed faulty email of mine.
>>>
>>> replies inline.
>>> On 11/30/2018 12:42 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On 11/29/18 12:17 AM, Manjunath Patil wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Feel free to suggest/comment on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to do the following at dst during the migration now.
>>>>> 1. Dont clear the old rinfo in blkif_free(). Instead just clean it.
>>>>> 2. Store the old rinfo and nr_rings into temp variables in
>>>>> negotiate_mq()
>>>>> 3. let nr_rings get re-calculated based on backend data
>>>>> 4. try allocating new memory based on new nr_rings
>>>> Since I suspect number of rings will likely be the same why not reuse
>>>> the rings in the common case?
>>> I thought attaching devices will be more often than migration. Hence
>>> did not want add to an extra check for
>>>    - if I am inside migration code path and
>>>    - if new nr_rings is equal to old nr_rings or not
>>>
>>> Sure addition of such a thing would avoid the memory allocation
>>> altogether in migration path,
>>> but it would add a little overhead for normal device addition.
>>>
>>> Do you think its worth adding that change?
>>
>> IMO a couple of extra checks are not going to make much difference.
> I will add this change
>>
>> I wonder though --- have you actually seen the case where you did fail
>> allocation and changes provided in this patch made things work? I am
>> asking because right after negotiate_mq() we will call setup_blkring()
>> and it will want to allocate bunch of memory. A failure there is fatal
>> (to ring setup). So it seems to me that you will survive negotiate_mq()
>> but then will likely fail soon after.
> I have noticed the ENOMEM insise negotiate_mq() on ct machine. When I
> included my patch, I manually triggered the ENOMEM using a debug flag.
> The patch works for ENOMEM inside negotiate_mq().
>
> As you mentioned, if we really hit the ENOMEM in negotiate_mq(), we
> might hit it in setup_blkring() as well.
> We should add the similar change to blkif_sring struct as well.


Won't you have a similar issue with other frontends, say, netfront?


-boris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to