On 12/12/2018 14:58, Andrii Anisov wrote:


On 12.12.18 16:49, Julien Grall wrote:
ASSERT only tells you that desc->action was NULL. It does not tell you which IRQ has the desc->action == NULL.
Ah, yes.

It is a bit a shame we don't have way to provide another message with ASSERT to help you debugging.
We might have implemented an assert with a message.
And guys on stackoverflow suggest for workaround `ASSERT(condition && "error message")`.

That's not going to help for showing the IRQ number.


No, I am suggesting to have the current if ( test_bit(...) ) protecred with #ifndef NDEBUG. No code duplication.
I would not like to leave even non-debug build without the check.

The check is mainly there to catch error in debug build. So I am quite confused what is your goal by moving the check. Is it just because it adds a couple more instruction in the guest case?

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to