> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM > > > In any case, I think you want to rename the function and/or document > > more that expected behavior. > > You're right, I should probably rename that function / variable to > better reflect what it signifies - that sync vm_event processing is in > progress. For VMX and SVM, that simply means that interrupts will be > blocked, and the value of the variable will be correct and possibly > useful for ARM as well. >
what about vm_event_block_interrupt_injection? in that case it's injection instead of interrupt itself being blocked. blocking injection should mean same thing cross archs? Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
