As in a few cases before, since the insns here and in particular their
memory access patterns follow the usual scheme, I didn't think it was
necessary to add a contrived test specifically for them, beyond the
Disp8 scaling one.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
---
v7: Re-base over change earlier in the series.
v6: New.

--- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c
+++ b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/evex-disp8.c
@@ -558,6 +558,14 @@ static const struct test avx512_vbmi_all
 static const struct test avx512_vbmi2_all[] = {
     INSN(pcompress, 66, 0f38, 63, vl, bw, el),
     INSN(pexpand,   66, 0f38, 62, vl, bw, el),
+    INSN(pshld,     66, 0f3a, 71, vl, dq, vl),
+    INSN(pshldv,    66, 0f38, 71, vl, dq, vl),
+    INSN(pshldvw,   66, 0f38, 70, vl,  w, vl),
+    INSN(pshldw,    66, 0f3a, 70, vl,  w, vl),
+    INSN(pshrd,     66, 0f3a, 73, vl, dq, vl),
+    INSN(pshrdv,    66, 0f38, 73, vl, dq, vl),
+    INSN(pshrdvw,   66, 0f38, 72, vl,  w, vl),
+    INSN(pshrdw,    66, 0f3a, 72, vl,  w, vl),
 };
 
 static const struct test avx512_vpopcntdq_all[] = {
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
@@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static const struct ext0f38_table {
     [0x62] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .two_op = 1, .d8s = d8s_bw },
     [0x63] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .to_mem = 1, .two_op = 1, .d8s = 
d8s_bw },
     [0x64 ... 0x66] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
+    [0x70 ... 0x73] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
     [0x75 ... 0x76] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
     [0x77] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_fp, .d8s = d8s_vl },
     [0x78] = { .simd_size = simd_other, .two_op = 1 },
@@ -611,6 +612,7 @@ static const struct ext0f3a_table {
     [0x6a ... 0x6b] = { .simd_size = simd_scalar_opc, .four_op = 1 },
     [0x6c ... 0x6d] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_fp, .four_op = 1 },
     [0x6e ... 0x6f] = { .simd_size = simd_scalar_opc, .four_op = 1 },
+    [0x70 ... 0x73] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
     [0x78 ... 0x79] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_fp, .four_op = 1 },
     [0x7a ... 0x7b] = { .simd_size = simd_scalar_opc, .four_op = 1 },
     [0x7c ... 0x7d] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_fp, .four_op = 1 },
@@ -8982,6 +8984,16 @@ x86_emulate(
         }
         goto simd_zmm;
 
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x70): /* vpshldvw 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x72): /* vpshrdvw 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+        generate_exception_if(!evex.w, EXC_UD);
+        elem_bytes = 2;
+        /* fall through */
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x71): /* vpshldv{d,q} 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x73): /* vpshrdv{d,q} 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+        host_and_vcpu_must_have(avx512_vbmi2);
+        goto avx512f_no_sae;
+
     case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x75): /* vpermi2{b,w} 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
     case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x7d): /* vpermt2{b,w} 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
     case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f38, 0x8d): /* vperm{b,w} 
[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
@@ -10268,6 +10280,16 @@ x86_emulate(
         avx512_vlen_check(true);
         goto simd_imm8_zmm;
 
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f3a, 0x70): /* vpshldw 
$imm8,[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f3a, 0x72): /* vpshrdw 
$imm8,[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+        generate_exception_if(!evex.w, EXC_UD);
+        elem_bytes = 2;
+        /* fall through */
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f3a, 0x71): /* vpshld{d,q} 
$imm8,[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+    case X86EMUL_OPC_EVEX_66(0x0f3a, 0x73): /* vpshrd{d,q} 
$imm8,[xyz]mm/mem,[xyz]mm,[xyz]mm{k} */
+        host_and_vcpu_must_have(avx512_vbmi2);
+        goto avx512f_imm8_no_sae;
+
     case X86EMUL_OPC(0x0f3a, 0xcc):     /* sha1rnds4 $imm8,xmm/m128,xmm */
         host_and_vcpu_must_have(sha);
         op_bytes = 16;





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to