On 1/16/19 10:29 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 16:07, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 1/16/19 9:33 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 16/01/2019 14:17, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:50:13AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1650,13 +1650,14 @@ void xen_callback_vector(void)
>>>>> xen_have_vector_callback = 0;
>>>>> return;
>>>>> }
>>>>> - pr_info("Xen HVM callback vector for event delivery is
>>>>> enabled\n");
>>>>> + if (!silent)
>>>>> + pr_info("Xen HVM callback vector for event
>>>>> delivery is enabled\n");
>>>> How about replacing pr_info() with pr_info_once()?
>>> What a nice and simple idea!
>>>
>>> Extra patch or V4?
>>>
>>
>> I can add this while committing, I don't think it's worth a whole new patch.
>>
>> One outstanding question I have is whether anything needs to be added to
>> the commit message (Thomas had some questions)
> He didn't react to my explanation. I'm interpreting that as him being
> fine with my explanation, which I believe is not suitable to be added
> to the commit message.
OK. Applied to (now properly named) for-linus-5.0
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
