>>> On 06.05.19 at 10:34, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote:
> On 06/05/2019 10:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 06.05.19 at 08:56, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -207,6 +250,141 @@ static inline void sched_free_domdata(const struct
>>> scheduler *s,
>>> ASSERT(!data);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline void *sched_alloc_pdata(const struct scheduler *s, int cpu)
>>> +{
>>> + if ( s->alloc_pdata )
>>> + return s->alloc_pdata(s, cpu);
>>> + else
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>
>> In cases like this one I'd like to ask that either ?: be used, or the
>> pointless
>> "else" be dropped.
>
> Fine with me. I guess adapting the already existing inline wrappers to
> that scheme with the same patch is okay?
I suppose so, unless that would grow the size of the patch
significantly.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
