On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:07:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Dynamically allocated CPU mask objects may be smaller than cpumask_t, so
> copying has to be restricted to the actual allocation size. This is
> particulary important since the function doesn't bail early when tracing
> is not active, so even production builds would be affected by potential
> misbehavior here.
> 
> Take the opportunity and also
> - use initializers instead of assignment + memset(),
> - constify the cpumask_t input pointer,
> - u32 -> uint32_t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to