On 15/03/2019 10:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> @@ -435,7 +435,10 @@ static const struct ext0f38_table {
> disp8scale_t d8s:4;
> } ext0f38_table[256] = {
> [0x00] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
> - [0x01 ... 0x0b] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int },
> + [0x01 ... 0x03] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int },
> + [0x04] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
> + [0x05 ... 0x0b] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int },
> + [0x0b] = { .simd_size = simd_packed_int, .d8s = d8s_vl },
It doesn't look as if you mean 0x0b twice here, although its quite
possible that GCC elides it silently (Clang definitely won't).
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
