On 30.07.2019 10:54, Julien Grall wrote: > On 7/30/19 9:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 30.07.2019 08:56, Lukasz Hawrylko wrote: >>> Support for Intel TXT has orphaned status right now because >>> no active maintainter is listed. Adding myself as reviewer >>> and moving it to Odd Fixes state. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Hawrylko <lukasz.hawry...@intel.com> >>> --- >>> MAINTAINERS | 3 ++- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>> index 89a01b710b..ca300e87c8 100644 >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>> @@ -240,7 +240,8 @@ S: Maintained >>> F: tools/golang >>> INTEL(R) TRUSTED EXECUTION TECHNOLOGY (TXT) >>> -S: Orphaned >>> +R: Lukasz Hawrylko <lukasz.hawry...@intel.com> >>> +S: Odd Fixes >> >> I guess we should give it a few days for objections to be raised >> against this slightly inconsistent state, but I think that's the >> best way to express the current state of things (hence my >> suggestion to this effect). If no objections turn up, I've queued >> this onto my to-be-committed list. > > I have some objections regarding the process itself... On the first > version of this patch, it was pointed out that the e-mail shouldn't > be sent with disclaimer. This is now the third version and the > disclaimer is still present.
Okay, I must have missed both earlier requests to this effect. I've gone back to the list archives though, and I couldn't find any such request either from July or June. Therefore ... > Technically, no patch should be applied when there are a disclaimer. ... I'd also like to ask for the background of this. It would never have occurred to me that I should pay attention to possible disclaimers or alike on patch submissions. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
