On 29.08.2019 12:20, Paul Durrant wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> Sent: 29 August 2019 10:52 >> To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> >> Cc: 'JulienGrall' <julien.gr...@arm.com>; 'Alexandru Isaila' >> <aisa...@bitdefender.com>; 'Petre >> Pircalabu' <ppircal...@bitdefender.com>; 'Razvan Cojocaru' >> <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com>; Andrew Cooper >> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Ian >> Jackson >> <ian.jack...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>; >> 'VolodymyrBabchuk' >> <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>; 'Stefano Stabellini' <sstabell...@kernel.org>; >> 'xen- >> de...@lists.xenproject.org' <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; 'Konrad >> Rzeszutek Wilk' >> <konrad.w...@oracle.com>; 'Tamas K Lengyel' <ta...@tklengyel.com>; Tim >> (Xen.org) <t...@xen.org>; 'Wei >> Liu' <w...@xen.org> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] remove late (on-demand) construction of >> IOMMU page tables >> >> On 29.08.2019 11:33, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> TBH I've seen sufficient numbers of domain create failures when using >>> auto-ballooning that I stopped using it some time ago (besides the fact >>> that it's slow). If you're happy with the simplistic >>> double-the-page-table-reservation calculation then I can add that but >>> IMO it would be better to add another patch to just remove auto-ballooning. >> >> I'd not be overly happy, but I could live with this. But this needs >> consent by others, not the least the tool stack maintainers. >> > > Ok. I'll deal with that later. Looking again though, I'm not sure what > you mean by 'the amount reserved for page tables'? Do you mean > 'shadow_memkb' or something else?
This one, I think, yes, or the value it gets defaulted to when not set in the guest config file. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
