> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 02 September 2019 12:10 > To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monne > <roger....@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > Subject: Ping: [PATCH 1/6] x86emul: generalize wbinvd() hook > > On 01.07.2019 13:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > > The hook is already in use for other purposes, and emulating e.g. > > CLFLUSH by issuing WBINVD is, well, not very nice. Rename the hook and > > add parameters. Use lighter weight flushing insns when possible in > > hvmemul_cache_op(). > > > > hvmemul_cache_op() treating x86emul_invd the same as x86emul_wbinvd is > > to retain original behavior, but I'm not sure this is what we want in > > the long run. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > Paul, > > any chance I could get your ack (or otherwise) here? I thought I did > answer the one question you had raised to your satisfaction. >
Yes, you did. Sorry for not acking earlier. Acked-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
