On 12.09.2019 16:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On a different question, AFAICT hvm_set_cr3 should never be called > with X86_CR3_NOFLUSH set? If so, do you think it would make sense to > add an assert to that regard?
I've been debating this with myself, and decided against for now. We don't know what meaning the bit may gain eventually in the actual register. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
