Hi Volodymyr,
On 9/11/19 7:41 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
Julien Grall writes:
On 8/23/19 8:20 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi,
Apologies for the delay.
It is okay. I myself was busy a bit.
Julien Grall writes:
Hi,
On 8/23/19 7:48 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
As all TODOs and potential security issues are resolved now,
remove experimental status from OP-TEE mediator.
Looking at SUPPORT.MD, I think OP-TEE without this series would be
considered as "Experimental".
Right.
With this series applied, I still think we should keep the Kconfig
behind EXPERT but mark it as "Technical Preview" for at least a
release. This would encourage people to test and report any potential
issues with OP-TEE.
We can re-discuss about the state in a few months for future release.
BTW, SUPPORT.MD should be updated to reflect the state of OP-TEE in Xen.
Fair enough. In the next version I'll replace this patch with patch to
SUPPORT.md. Or it is better to push separate patch for the documentation?
I think the patch in SUPPORT.MD should go regardless of the state of
the rest. It is fine to keep it in this series.
Okay. By the way, I skimmed thru SUPPORT.MD and I'm not sure what is the
best place to describe mediator. So I could use some advice there.
Good question. I would put it under "## Virtual Hardware, Hypervisor".
Maybe after the subsection "### ARM: Guest ACPI support"?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel