On 11.11.19 13:20, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

The non-zero check on ret is always going to be false because
ret was initialized as zero and the only place it is set to
non-zero contains a return path before the non-zero check. Hence
the check is redundant and can be removed.

Which version did you patch against? In current master the above
statement is not true.


Juergen


Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
  drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 5 -----
  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
index 10cc5e9e612a..07d80b176118 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
@@ -524,11 +524,6 @@ static int gntdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file 
*flip)
        }
  #endif
- if (ret) {
-               kfree(priv);
-               return ret;
-       }
-
        flip->private_data = priv;
  #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC
        priv->dma_dev = gntdev_miscdev.this_device;



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to