> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org> On Behalf Of Ian
> Jackson
> Sent: 30 January 2020 17:32
> To: Durrant, Paul <pdurr...@amazon.co.uk>
> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of
> INVALID_DOMID to the API
>
> Paul Durrant writes ("[PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of
> INVALID_DOMID to the API"):
> > Currently both xl and libxl have internal definitions of INVALID_DOMID
> > which happen to be identical. However, for the purposes of describing
> the
> > behaviour of libxl_domain_create_new/restore() it is useful to have a
> > specified invalid value for a domain id.
>
> Hi. (I'm replying to the 1/ here because I don't seem to have any 0/
> in my inbox...)
>
Oh, I must have forgot to copy the combined cc list onto the cover letter.
Sorry about that.
> Thanks for all this. As well as your use case, which is in itself
> valuable, I think this change is important for other reasons.
> So I want to see it go in.
>
> You'll see I have replied with some comments about the implementation.
> I hope you won't be discouraged. If you feel I am asking for too much
> work I might be inclined to pick up some of this myself; if so, please
> let me know. I definitely don't want this to be dropped.
Don't worry, your feedback is fine... certainly not asking too much.
Cheers,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
