On 24.03.2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for
> varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least
> some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later.
> 
> Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on
> "libx86/CPUID: fix (not just) leaf 7 processing", while at
> least patch 2 contextually depends on "x86emul: disable
> FPU/MMX/SIMD insn emulation when !HVM".
> 
>  1: x86emul: support AVX512_BF16 insns

Thanks for the ack on patch 1, which I've just pushed, but may I
also ask for an ack or otherwise on the (test harness) prereq
named above, and ideally also the other patch named there?

Thanks, Jan

Reply via email to