> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 30 March 2020 11:54 > To: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; > Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools/misc: add xen-ctx to present domain context > > On 27.03.2020 19:50, Paul Durrant wrote: > > This tools is analogous to 'xen-hvmctx' which presents HVM context. > > Subsequent patches will add 'dump' functions when new records are > > introduced. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org> > > --- > > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > > Cc: Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > > --- > > .gitignore | 1 + > > tools/misc/Makefile | 4 ++ > > tools/misc/xen-ctx.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Is xen-ctx a good choice of a name, considering we already have not > only xen-hvmctx, but also xenctx? If the new functionality isn't a > good fit for either, perhaps its name would better reflect its > connection to save/restore records? xen-sr-dump looks pretty clumsy > to me, but still seems better than a name easily mixed up with > others.
How about xen-domctx? Paul > > Jan
