On 06.04.2020 12:34, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> Do you think this should also appear in a comment? Do we really care? >>> Nothing fundamentally prevents >> the mechanism being used for HVM state, but that may introduce an ordering >> dependency. >> >> I don't particularly like the idea to let the contributor decide where >> "HVM context" or as part of the "Domain context". >> >> This is going to result to unwanted dependency and possibly >> bikeshedding on where they should be saved. >> >> My preference would be to mark the existing framework as deprecated and >> force all the new states to be saved as part of the new "Domain Context". > > I'm ok with that. Any others have any opinion to the contrary?
Well, not in principle, but I won't have a firm opinion until I've actually looked at (relevant parts of) the patches. Jan
