On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:31 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 17.03.2020 16:23, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > Below is the diff. It was messier and I tidied it up some. > > I've looked into this some more. I can see how what we currently > do is not in line with firmware handing off with LegacyReplacement > mode enabled. However, this case doesn't look to apply here:
Thanks for taking a look again. Sorry for the slow response. I wanted to dig through the linux history to see if there was a reason for enabling the periodic timer there, but I haven't gotten around to it. > So right now the only possible approach I see to address your > problem is to add yet another fallback mode to check_timer(), > forcing LegacyReplacement mode to be enabled. But between / > after which step(s) to put this there isn't at all obvious to me. I don't really have a good suggestion here. Aaron, I'm curious to know if you've tried this patch on your hardware and if it helped. Thanks again, Jason
