> On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Paul Durrant <xadimg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org> On Behalf Of Tamas >> K Lengyel >> Sent: 01 June 2020 14:22 >> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>; Stefano Stabellini >> <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Tamas K Lengyel >> <tamas.leng...@intel.com>; Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>; Wei Liu >> <w...@xen.org>; Andrew Cooper >> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; George >> Dunlap >> <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Tamas K Lengyel <ta...@tklengyel.com>; Jan >> Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>; >> Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; Julien Grall <jul...@xen.org>; >> Roger Pau Monné >> <roger....@citrix.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v19 for-4.14 00/13] VM forking > > Hi, > > This series looks to be largely un-acked so, since we are now past the > freeze date, I don't really think it can go into 4.14. Is there a particular > reason that you think it should be considered?
Tamas’ project itself mainly uses libxc and below, as I understand; and so getting patches 1 and 2 in would be an important milestone; both have had R-b’s before the feature freeze. Arguably patches 1 and 2 are a bug fix. Patch 1 is missing VMX (or a general x86). The libxl/xl side hasn’t, as I understand it, had significant review; I think that should probably wait until 4.15. What do you think, Tamas? -George
