> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>
> Sent: 26 June 2020 12:25
> To: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com>
> Cc: p...@xen.org; Roger Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>; 'Grzegorz Uriasz'
> <gorba...@gmail.com>; 'Jan
> Beulich' <jbeul...@suse.com>; Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>;
> Kevin Tian
> <kevin.t...@intel.com>; 'Wei Liu' <w...@xen.org>; ja...@bartmin.ski;
> marma...@invisiblethingslab.com;
> j.nowa...@student.uw.edu.pl; Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; xen-
> de...@lists.xenproject.org; cont...@puzio.waw.pl
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:39:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Paul Durrant writes ("RE: [PATCH] libxl: tooling expects wrong errno"):
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com>
> > > > Thanks for the analysis. So:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
> > > >
> > > > This would seem to be a backport candidate. AFAICT check has been
> > > > there, looking for ENOSYS, since this code was introduced in
> > > > 826eb17271d3c647516d9944c47b0779afedea25
> > > > libxl: suppress device assignment to HVM guest when there is no IOMMU
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > But that commit has a Tested-by. Maybe Xen changed its error return
> > > > at some point ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it happened in 71e617a6b8f69849c70eda1b3c58f1ff6b244e5a
> > > use is_iommu_enabled() where appropriate...
> >
> > So,
> >
> > Backport: 4.13
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> This is not yet committed. Paul, can I get a release ack from you?
>
> Wei.
Yes.
Release-acked-by: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org>
>
> >
> > Ian.
