On 07/08/2020 11:56, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.08.2020 18:16, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 06/08/2020 10:05, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Can't we remove all of this by having CONFIG_XEN_PE expressed/selectable >> properly in Kconfig, and gathering all the objects normally, rather than >> bodging all of common/efi/ through arch/efi/ ? > _If_ we settle on Kconfig to be allowed to check compiler (and linker) > features, then yes. This continues to be a pending topic though, so > the switch can't be made like this at this point in time. (It could be > made a Kconfig item now - which, when enabled, implies the assertion > that a capable tool chain is in use.)
I am still of the opinion that nothing needs discussing, but you are obviously not. Please raise this as a topic and lets discuss it, because it has a meaningful impacting on a large number of pending series. ~Andrew
