On 13/08/2020 00:35, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 12/08/2020 20:06, Trammell Hudson wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:16 PM, Andrew Cooper >> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> If you want, I can sort that out as a prereq patch, and rebase this one >>> on top? >> That sounds fine to me. They really are two separate patches. > I think we're fine caveat wise. I'll try and find some time tomorrow.
So the __UNIQUE_ID() plan doesn't work, as a consequence of the logic inside ignore_param() to shuffle the string name into initdata. As everything is in .initdata, it doesn't actually interact with LIVEPATCH. I've committed this patch with an extra note to try and prevent TEMP_NAME() being used in wider contexts. ~Andrew
