On 09.09.2020 11:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> They are currently named after the FSGSBASE instructions, but are not thin
> wrappers around said instructions, and therefore do not accurately reflect the
> logic they perform, especially when it comes to functioning safely in non
> FSGSBASE context.
>
> Rename them to {read,write}_{fs,gs}_base() to avoid confusion.
Well, I didn't think the names were confusing, but since you look
to think otherwise ...
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Jan
