On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > This combination doesn't really make sense (and there likely are more). > The alternative here would be some presumably intrusive #ifdef-ary to > get this combination to actually build again. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
I'm not sure I see a way to cater for Andrew requests while allowing PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE to gate options in order to be able to remove code. Maybe PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE should be moved to the top level Kconfig screen on x86 and behave like a list, so that you select a 'Normal' hypervisor build or a 'PV shim exclusive' build, and that could completely change the contents of the menus? If that doesn't seem suitable I think the proposed patch is a good option unless someone has a better approach. Thanks, Roger.
