On 13.10.2020 13:40, Andrew Cooper wrote: > (Interestingly, zero length > alternatives do appear to compile, and this is clearly a bug.)
Why? The replacement code may be intended to be all NOPs. Jan
- [PATCH v2 0/6] x86: some assembler macro rework Jan Beulich
- [PATCH v2 1/6] x86: replace __ASM_{CL,ST}AC Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86: replace __ASM_{CL,ST}AC Andrew Cooper
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] x86: replace __ASM_{CL,ST... Jan Beulich
- [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: reduce CET-SS related #ifdef-ary Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: reduce CET-SS related #i... Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: reduce CET-SS relate... Andrew Cooper
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: reduce CET-SS re... Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: reduce CET-SS related #i... Andrew Cooper
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86: reduce CET-SS relate... Jan Beulich
- [PATCH v2 3/6] x86: drop ASM_{CL,ST}AC Jan Beulich
- [PATCH v2 4/6] x86: fold indirect_thunk_asm.h into a... Jan Beulich
- [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: guard against straight-line spec... Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: guard against straight-l... Roger Pau Monné
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: guard against straig... Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: guard against straight-l... Andrew Cooper
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: guard against straig... Jan Beulich
- [PATCH v2 6/6] x86: limit amount of INT3 in IND_THUN... Jan Beulich
