> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Sent: 27 November 2020 16:22
> To: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org>
> Cc: Durrant, Paul <pdurr...@amazon.co.uk>; Andrew Cooper 
> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; George Dunlap
> <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; Grall, 
> Julien
> <jgr...@amazon.co.uk>; Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>; Kevin Tian 
> <kevin.t...@intel.com>; Roger
> Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>; Stefano Stabellini 
> <sstabell...@kernel.org>; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org>;
> xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v10 0/7] IOMMU cleanup
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
> links or open
> attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On 20.11.2020 14:24, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > From: Paul Durrant <pdurr...@amazon.com>
> >
> > This is the remainder of the cleanup series deferred until XSA-346 and
> > XSA-347 were publicly disclosed.
> >
> > Paul Durrant (7):
> >   remove remaining uses of iommu_legacy_map/unmap
> >   common/grant_table: batch flush I/O TLB
> >   iommu: remove the share_p2m operation
> >   iommu: stop calling IOMMU page tables 'p2m tables'
> 
> Are the latter two patches dependent upon the former two, or could
> they go in independently?
> 

Not really. They should be able to go in ahead of the other two.

  Paul

> Jan

Reply via email to