On 26/11/2020 15:51, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> The goal of this serie is to emulate coprocessor ID registers so that
> Xen only publish to guest features that are supported by Xen and can
> actually be used by guests.
> One practical example where this is required are SVE support which is
> forbidden by Xen as it is not supported, but if Linux is compiled with
> it, it will crash on boot. An other one is AMU which is also forbidden
> by Xen but one Linux compiled with it would crash if the platform
> supports it.
>
> To be able to emulate the coprocessor registers defining what features
> are supported by the hardware, the TID3 bit of HCR must be disabled and
> Xen must emulated the values of those registers when an exception is
> catched when a guest is accessing it.
>
> This serie is first creating a guest cpuinfo structure which will
> contain the values that we want to publish to the guests and then
> provides the proper emulationg for those registers when Xen is getting
> an exception due to an access to any of those registers.
>
> This is a first simple implementation to solve the problem and the way
> to define the values that we provide to guests and which features are
> disabled will be in a future patchset enhance so that we could decide
> per guest what can be used or not and depending on this deduce the bits
> to activate in HCR and the values that we must publish on ID registers.
>
> Bertrand Marquis (7):
>   xen/arm: Add ID registers and complete cpufinfo
>   xen/arm: Add arm64 ID registers definitions
>   xen/arm: create a cpuinfo structure for guest
>   xen/arm: Add handler for ID registers on arm64
>   xen/arm: Add handler for cp15 ID registers
>   xen/arm: Add CP10 exception support to handle VMFR
>   xen/arm: Activate TID3 in HCR_EL2

CI found an ARM randconfig failure against this series.

https://gitlab.com/xen-project/patchew/xen/-/pipelines/221798884

I have admit that I can't spot an obvious connection so it might be
collateral damage from elsewhere, but does need looking at irrespective.

~Andrew (in lieu of a real CI robot).

Reply via email to