Hi Bertrand,
On 09/03/2021 14:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 9 Mar 2021, at 12:04, Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08.03.2021 20:48, Julien Grall wrote:
On 08/03/2021 17:18, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
@@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ void start_secondary(void)
if ( !opt_hmp_unsafe &&
current_cpu_data.midr.bits != boot_cpu_data.midr.bits )
{
- printk(XENLOG_ERR "CPU%u MIDR (0x%x) does not match boot CPU MIDR
(0x%x),\n"
+ printk(XENLOG_ERR "CPU%u MIDR (0x%"PRIregister") does not match boot "
+ "CPU MIDR (0x%"PRIregister"),\n"
For printk messages, we don't tend to split it like that (even for more
than 80 characters one). Instead, the preferred approach is:
printk(XENLOG_ERR
"line 1\n"
"line 2\n")
Except of course you want to repeat XENLOG_ERR for the 2nd line.
Interesting, I always thought a single XENLOG_* was enough for
multi-line in the same printk.
Very right.
@Julien: feel free to tell me if you want a v2.
I would prefer if you resend a v2.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall