Hi Rahul,

> On 16 Apr 2021, at 12:25, Rahul Singh <rahul.si...@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Revert the code that associates the group pointer with the S2CR as this
> code causing an issue when the SMMU device has more than one master
> device.
> 
> This code is merged with the commit  "xen/arm: smmuv1: Intelligent
> SMR allocation”.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.si...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com>

Cheers,
Bertrand

> ---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 44 +++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c 
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
> index 24ac4f3a80..1a68c2ab3b 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c
> @@ -597,7 +597,6 @@ enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
> };
> 
> struct arm_smmu_s2cr {
> -     struct iommu_group              *group;
>       int                             count;
>       enum arm_smmu_s2cr_type         type;
>       enum arm_smmu_s2cr_privcfg      privcfg;
> @@ -1498,7 +1497,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device 
> *dev)
>       struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = find_smmu_master_cfg(dev);
>       struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
>       struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs = smmu->smrs;
> -     struct iommu_group *group;
>       int i, idx, ret;
> 
>       spin_lock(&smmu->stream_map_lock);
> @@ -1523,19 +1521,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device 
> *dev)
>               cfg->smendx[i] = (s16)idx;
>       }
> 
> -     group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> -     if (!group)
> -             group = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> -     if (IS_ERR(group)) {
> -             ret = PTR_ERR(group);
> -             goto out_err;
> -     }
> -     iommu_group_put(group);
> -
>       /* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */
>       for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) {
>               arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
> -             smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
>       }
> 
>       spin_unlock(&smmu->stream_map_lock);
> @@ -1966,27 +1954,6 @@ static void __arm_smmu_release_pci_iommudata(void 
> *data)
>       kfree(data);
> }
> 
> -static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct
> -                                             arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg)
> -{
> -     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
> -     struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
> -     int i, idx;
> -
> -     for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, i, idx) {
> -             if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
> -                 group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
> -                     return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -
> -             group = smmu->s2crs[idx].group;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (group)
> -             return group;
> -
> -     return NULL;
> -}
> -
> static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> {
>       struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> @@ -2027,13 +1994,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>               cfg->smmu = smmu;
>       }
> 
> -     group = arm_smmu_device_group(cfg);
> -     if (!group) {
> -             group = iommu_group_alloc();
> -             if (IS_ERR(group)) {
> -                     dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate IOMMU group\n");
> -                     return PTR_ERR(group);
> -             }
> +     group = iommu_group_alloc();
> +     if (IS_ERR(group)) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate IOMMU group\n");
> +             return PTR_ERR(group);
>       }
> 
>       iommu_group_set_iommudata(group, cfg, releasefn);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to