Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:49:22 +0100, John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 07:39:45AM -0800, Frank Batschulat wrote: >> >>> 1) PV (non-graphics) domU - ONNV build 82 (source = iso image ondisk) >>> >>> - installation into a ZPOOL/ZVOL - success >>> - installation into a raw partition /dev/dsk - failed with panic in SATA >>> driver >> Can you file a bug with the dump please? > > will do once I have the 2 dumps in SWAN and finished a little bit of digging > to make judgement to which cat/subcat they belong to. > >>> 2) HVW FreeBSD 6.3 (source = iso image ondisk) >> I don't believe we've tested FreeBSD HVM at all. > > hmmm I arrived at that idea based on: > > http://opensolaris.org/os/community/xen/docs/specs/ > > Supported configurations include the following: > > Solaris dom0, Solaris domU, Linux domU, FreeBSD domU
There is a FreeBSD thread on a list somewhere. I thought that 7.x worked and there was a workaround for 6.3. Something to do with the hard disk driver mayybe? >>> 5) HVM OpenSuse 10.3 Linux (source = iso image on disk, on cd) >> This is broken everywhere in Xen. > > does that mean using fedora 8 or CentOS 5.1 or Ubunthu 7.10 > make me happy ? I have them all handy here ;-) Here's my list; all of which work on my Intel system. : alpha[1]#; xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 3886 2 r----- 96.7 asteriskNOW 512 1 0.0 centos3 512 1 0.0 centos4 512 1 0.0 centos5 512 1 0.0 centos5-1 512 1 0.0 debian4 512 1 0.0 embedded 512 1 0.0 fedora6 512 1 0.0 fedora7 512 1 0.0 fedora8 512 1 0.0 gentoo 512 1 0.0 path-lamp 512 1 0.0 pkg 512 1 0.0 rhel3 512 1 0.0 rhel4 512 1 0.0 rhel5 512 1 0.0 s10u3 512 1 0.0 s10u4 512 1 0.0 s10u5 512 1 0.0 Nevada 512 1 0.0 ubuntu 512 1 0.0 vista 1024 1 0.0 winxp 512 1 0.0 : alpha[1]#; >>> 3) HVM Windows 98 (source = iso image on disk) >>> 4) HVM Windows XP 64 (source = iso image on disk) >> I think these should work fine in the forthcoming 3.1 >> >> For 3.0.4, Windows XP works pretty well. > > is windows 98 supposed to work at all ? Not supported. Didn't work the last time I tried. Maybe in the future. > is there a difference between 32 and 64 bit XP ? Yes. > is service pack 2 for XP required ? No sure. It's hard to keep track of all the different versions of everything. I am using SP2. MRJ _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
