> 
> On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 20:39 +0200, Bernd Schemmer
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > did you already check that it's not the old
> checksum problem again?
> > 
> > e.g.
> > 
> > execute
> > 
> > ethtool -K eth0 tx off
> > 
> > in the Linux DomU?
> I bet it is. I've seen the same problem in a Fedora 8
> domU. I colud ping
> the host system and all boxes on the same subnet. All
> real data (name
> service, ssh etc) just didn't work .
Through my experience:-
***************************************************************************************
If you installed dnsmasq service and all  members of Virtualization 
group properly. Daemons libvirtd & dnsmasq (as DHCP server) will provide
bridging and NAT forwarding from F8 Dom0 to any DomU (SNV85,F8,..)
on subnet 192.168.122.1 (netmask 255.255.255.0) perfectly.
Phyton profiles of DomUs should have entry:-
vif=['bridge=virbr0']
Othewise F8 install along with Xen has to run on box connected
to DHCP Bridge.Finally "brctl show" will provide you two bridges.
Entry like vif=[' '] will use xen bridge based  on ethernet interface connected 
Physical  DHCP Bridge Device and will put DomU on the same subnet with
Dom0 with old fashion xen bridging implemented.
Tuning /etc/xen/xend-conf.sxp is different for case one and case two.
RHEL 5.1 behaves same way and installs service "dnsmasq" automatically.
**************************************************************************************

> 
>   Bernd
> ______________________________________________
> xen-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to