boris, On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Boris Derzhavets <[email protected]> wrote: >>is 'Nevada' likely a more-functional, or at least better-behaved, >> option for me? > > OpenSolaris has a package management system kind of Ubuntu & Debian > have . It has an analog of Synaptic Manager (ubuntu). > As far as i know Nevada doesn't have such features in meantime.
as long as it has _some_ form of reliable cmd-line pkg mgmt, and access to reasonably up-to-date repos (and, i assume it has both), personally i don't care ... > However, i was always under impression that Solaris 11 is supposed to be > developed via Nevada Builds. All the efforts to build Xen 3.3.2 (3.4) Dom0 > on > Solaris Nevada clearly demonstrate mentioned intend. > If i am wrong about that, please, correct me. well, i'm certainly no authority ... but, again, @ javaone i was told that *opensolaris*, not SXCE, is the basis for "Solaris future" (whatever that _actually_ means ...) @ specific questions re: availability of xen 3.3/3.4, i was told "February-ish" -- in the context of opensolaris. this which-version-does-what-for-whom business is confusing. atm, i'm DL'ing nevada b115. we'll see how that works ... _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
