Hi, Alex and Keir > Would it make more sense to create the acpi_table_disable() and >support functions in the common acpi code? The only ia64 specific parts >of the implementation appear to be writing "XenIPF" for the OEM ID and >calling generate_acpi_checksum(). The latter could easily be moved, or >maybe we could make use of acpi_table_compute_checksum(). The new OEM >ID could be passed into the function, but it might be just as useful to >write the original table signature into the OEM ID field so we know what >it was (ex. "xSRATx"). Thanks, Exactly, I want to move them to common code. Keir, is this good?
BTW, we may rewrite also OEM Table ID. How about the below? signature = OEMx OEM ID = xSRATx OEM table ID = Xen Best Regards, Akio Takebe _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
