On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:12:41PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:07:13PM +0900, Kouya Shimura wrote: > > Shouldn't we call vcpu_increment_iip(v); unconditionally? > If pal_emul() returns other than IA64_NO_FAULT, > guest will issue the same break instruction again with same argument > resulting in no forward progress.
Isn't it what it expected in case of TLB miss injection ? Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
