Hi, xen_ssm_i() has barrier() after xen_set_virtual_psr_i(). I think xen_rsm_i() also need barrier(). Is this correct?
Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
diff -r b865b15fb54b include/asm-ia64/xen/privop.h
--- a/include/asm-ia64/xen/privop.h Mon Dec 10 15:04:49 2007 +0000
+++ b/include/asm-ia64/xen/privop.h Wed Dec 12 23:18:00 2007 +0900
@@ -229,7 +229,10 @@ extern void xen_set_eflag(unsigned long)
/* turning off interrupts can be paravirtualized simply by writing
* to a memory-mapped virtual psr.i bit (implemented as a 16-bit bool) */
-#define xen_rsm_i() xen_set_virtual_psr_i(0)
+#define xen_rsm_i() \
+{ xen_set_virtual_psr_i(0); \
+ barrier(); \
+}
/* turning on interrupts is a bit more complicated.. write to the
* memory-mapped virtual psr.i bit first (to avoid race condition),
barrier_in_xen_rsm_i.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
