Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
>> Yes, it is not SMP-safe there is lock for p2m.
>> Modifying p2m is not a frequent operation, why not add a lock for it?
> It is frequent to read p2m table. So lockless approach was adopted
> for scalability.
> It doesn't make sense to lock around only writer side.
If only add write lock for p2m, is there any bad impact/senario?
Can you explain more details?
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list