On 08 Αυγ 2006, at 8:37 ΠΜ, Haren Myneni wrote:
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 19:38 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Hmm, so we'll have at least three copies of this code: uboot,
and Xen. Would it make sense to put this stuff into a libdt.a?
Technically, dtc has a "libdt" already, but it's absurdly incomplete
(I don't even know why it's there), so we could just replace it.
Mark, I had a look at the code Pantelis wrote for u-boot, and it was
pretty easy to adapt to meet Xen's (userspace-based) needs. I've
attached my version below (and see ft_setup() at the bottom of the
file). Does it meet your requirements for the kernel bootwrapper?
One limitation of the attached code is that it doesn't support
the *size* of properties, though I don't think that would be too
difficult to add if needed.
Haren, what about using this in kexec-tools?
Good idea to have this lib. Based on brief look, some of these
funcs are also useful for kexec-tools. Yes, as you mentioned,
changing the size of properties is important for kexec/kdump.
Present flattened device-tree process in kexec-tools:
- Kexec-tool reads the /proc/device-tree and sort these entries
since we get the different order than the first kernel uses.
- creates linux,usable-memory property under /proc/device-tree/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as appropriate. (for kdump)
- Modify the reserve map for RTAS, initrd, TCE and (0- crashkernel-
- Create initrd properties if not exist in the first kernel as needed
- Modify bootargs property
Mind writing down what your requirements are? Just modifying the size
of the properties?
Note that my functions work in a two phases.
In the first phase the tree is build with the string table being put
at the end
of the allocated memory area in a downward motion.
When the tree is finalized the string table is memmov'ed to be
adjacent to the structure
Could you use this two phased approach for you uses? I.e. first work
with maximum sized
properties and perform a move & fixup stage when finalizing?
If everybody can use this (I expect small modifications would be
needed), I think we should turn it into a library in the dtc source
tree. The various projects using it could then include snapshots (to
avoid dependencies). In general I'd like to avoid everybody
maintaining their own version of this stuff (myself included).
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list