On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 23:16 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 04:50:54PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > > Since this patch wasn't committed, the shadow2 changes created > > conflicts. Here is the respin. Note that I have not tested with shadow2, > > but as you can see below the math doesn't need to be so complicated. > > > > Ewan, please apply or comment. > > Applied, thanks Hollis. Is this your only outstanding patch? I got lost > when you rev'd this one a couple of times ;-)
Thanks Ewan! I will have another patch for you shortly. :) Actually there was one bug we discovered as a result of the shadow merge: shadow_mem_control's arguments should be MB, not bytes. Here's the pseudo-diff: - shadow_cur = xc.shadow_mem_control(self.domid, shadow_kb * 1024) + shadow_cur = xc.shadow_mem_control(self.domid, shadow_kb / 1024) -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
